//
//
antique & original link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fTldTDjWIA
//
//
Posted on 5 ago 2017
//
//
antique & original link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fTldTDjWIA
//
//
Posted on 5 ago 2017
So here a friendly reminder: The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
NO ONE gonna define what will happen next if it isn't us.
One will never be unique even if one presumes to be strong inside while trying to impress others with appearances made photographs or suppously motivate ridiculous phrases which clearly will not help anyone to undertake. And at not finding any mistake on this one gonna just keep stand and to think that undertaking or start an independent business is not about repeating speeches about sacrifices either because people should engrave in their heads the normalized of laughing at any apparent stupidity produced by even bits of ignorance that become as hypocritical and extremist as a friendly smiling or a nice looking guy who spends his time dreaming of satisfactions and relationships with himself in ways that he defines as inexplicable because he simply has no idea what he is talking about; But there he is offering himself as associate, helper and friend while this guy is talking about kindness and considering himself as wholeheartedly posing totally impossible scenarios about losing everything and with a supposed end of laughing of himself at rising from the ashes like a phoenix.
And and so deep is this guy into his role that he finds himself satisfied with the conformity of encouraging others to support the most needy without doing anything from his comfort trench thinking and showing himself consumed with desires for the same comfort that he adores so much, like this as “financial education” that he cannot search or maybe does not know how to search for because his words instead seek empathy and placate feelings by talking about everything that is getting out of his hand with textual quotes that among his fingers are just a total joke because it cannot be anything else when he is just writing sentences such as "If economists really knew about business, they would be rich, and not advisers to the rich" (Kirk Kerkorian) trying to advise from a useless facebook page. As the same are also those who presume empty content and without context and without use to anyone since by taking them seriously they seem like third world policemen not qualified for absolutely anything ethically since they direct theirs index fingers to point out matters that do not concern them and they have lost the course of their own studies and their own basic role in the world of understanding themselves as people who serve people and are not fit to decide what the other should do or think. And perhaps the top off/height/the las straw of this kind of people is to be as on oneself from the first opportunity that they manage, for example, to be such social misfits who live a history fed little by little with ideological surfaces that among them even allow themselves to go from party to party or from place to place thinking how many or few seem not to belong to herds that evidently also exist and from which they do not escape, and among them it is also evident that staying to inhabit the shadows will never attract anything anywhere around the world.
Reaching then ot the point where everyone who has enough imagination for it, may visualize any possible walk through of what must happen every first time like some with the possibility of not dedicating himself to search too much or not to face dramas that happen at random from a fact of trying to dedicate their time to at least maintain oneself, they are simply capable of expanding inequalities for a simple sick pleasure that with each act they perceive with professions that require only time and practice to perform them as well as spaces to demonstrate them and of which they are able to show off themselves or do everything possible so that others do not find out about all the possible ways and results of doing the same, because a young person is very likely to still not know too much about himself and much of his behavior and his way of standing out can still depend on what surrounds him.
It is a common belief that one's background and upbringing play a significant role in shaping one's identity and defining who they are. However, it is important to consider whether one's identity is solely determined by their origins, or if there are other factors that contribute to their uniqueness. While one's cultural, social, and familial background undoubtedly influence their beliefs, values, and perspectives, it is not the sole determinant of their identity. People are complex and multi-faceted beings, influenced by a variety of factors beyond their origins. Personal experiences, relationships, education, and individual choices all contribute to shaping one's identity. It is also crucial to recognize the role of personal agency in defining one's identity. While one's background may provide a foundation, it is ultimately up to the individual to determine who they want to be and how they want to live their life. Each person has the power to create their own path, independent of their origins. Furthermore, the idea of uniqueness goes beyond simply coming from a certain place or having a particular background. It is about embracing one's individuality, celebrating differences, and recognizing the beauty of diversity. One's uniqueness is not defined by where they come from, but rather by how they choose to express themselves, engage with the world, and contribute to society.
In the modern age of social media and constant connectivity, there is a tendency for individuals to seek validation through external means such as photographs and motivational phrases. However, true uniqueness comes from within, from being comfortable in one's own skin and embracing one's authentic self. It is not about impressing others or conforming to societal expectations, but about being true to oneself. Moreover, the pursuit of entrepreneurship and independence is not about repeating empty speeches about sacrifices or projecting a false facade of success. It is about genuine hard work, determination, and a willingness to take risks. It is about being honest with oneself and others, and approaching challenges with humility and resilience. In conclusion, while one's background may have an impact on their identity, it does not solely define who they are. True uniqueness comes from within, from embracing one's individuality and pursuing one's passions. It is about being authentic, genuine, and sincere in one's actions and interactions with others. One's identity is shaped by a multitude of factors, and it is ultimately up to the individual to determine who they are and who they want to become.
Of course it is outrageous that people are not well prepared and with so little concern for their country, but most of them agree with our leaders only for money, the degree of impunity for their excesses. Citizens with apathy, conformists, indoctrinated, aligned, and left; Perhaps all accomplices under the degree of the subconscious. Yet all the advertisements we see have been etched into our memory and our decisions are apparently only based on consumer choices, but one is from the generation in which it was proclaimed daily that "There is nothing that is really necessary if you feel like that." Let heads rolling, how beneficial is it to preserve negative patterns? Is finding a balance without hypocrisy of abandoning oneself in any belief exclusively to win something possible? Betting on an almost Blaise Pascal style or perhaps a completely different one is utopian? (1)
One will try to explain himself, on my case it was difficult to grow up knowing that the thing that I could grab onto was dead from its roots, however, on my opinion there are no need to extreme resentments; And that is why I decided to search for social networks as an instrument of manifestation and social evolution, which I accept opened a channel of communication that on my perspective continues to be indifferent to their real needs: Different generations identify themselves as oppressed, perhaps for the same reason their modes of protest occasionally go beyond the limits that degrade new oppressed and exalt non-existent values, on the style of preparatory popularity, giving rise to aggression on any way and on any medium or place that can be made present. It seems easy to forget that the word of everywhere these days is Tolerance; To understand it is to achieve moral superiority by being tolerant. And it must be understood that tolerance does not mean suffering or enduring, and to fully tolerate it is necessary to want to. The desire to know new ideas and the need to emphasize them for study and debate, possibly thus managing to resolve our differences; Simple suggestion to stay flexible.
But to call this "on my practice", social reconciliation as a first step to achieve true national development is close to nil. Respect and the exercise of constructive criticism and ideological solidarity on every sense that strengthens the rule of law and national harmony, are forgotten when it comes to benefits. "What's good for me on the end?" Distrust predominates when becoming aware and does not consider who is legitimate, at some point pretending to act differently. There are too many things that do not retain any grace, life itself has no meaning in its generality. You might wonder why waste yourself? However, the most honest thing anyone can do, I suppose, is to be totally who you are and write, speak and act like one. Freedom of expression and belief, with all its immunity under the Magna Carta. Water and then wind.
P.S.
If theres an objection is facing references, this text is only research and personal analysis of all of them. No interest unrelated to the opinion, act of reply or preservation of various notes.
P.S.2.
Repost from Sunday, May 12, 2013
https://mojejstronie.blogspot.com/2013/05/1-uno.html?m=1
R:
(1). Understand the bet as regards the text as an example, for what is morally accepted or what is beneficial learned or modified through ethical advancement. Bet on their own beliefs, concepts, values and / or ideas that guide acts to growth, be it personal or collective, by not applying such a bet exclusively to a deity.
(1.2) It is accepted that Pascal does not intend to scientifically prove the existence of God and, in order not to fall into any fallacy of the false dilemma, let us qualify it as "Any deity or Zeitgeist from among the variety of options known from the theological field" for various applications or explanations about the quote or the present text.