Between memes and political agendas

If social networks are the daily exercise that people use today, can you trust them? Memes have become an integral part of our digital landscape, but how much they are shaping the way we communicate and express ideas in the online sphere among political agendas? The emergence of Memes as "resuelva, atiende" can really be traced back to only an Twitter-X user like taquira (@_____xemi)? Or maybe Alejandra del Moral and her "unir es resolver" never happened? Seems that to embody a message of unity and collective action, promoting the idea that coming together leads to solutions and progress also works to provoke confrontations about the ideal man to establish a successful relationship and his highlighted importance of having goals, working hard, taking care of one's health and, most importantly for her, having the ability to resolve conflicts; And then just finish delivering a supposed answer to this with additional wordiness with an "atiende". Are people from Mexico that easy? Alejandra del Moral utilized this slogan as a central theme in her campaign, which could also simply be an insult since by pretending that only brave people would dare to vote for the PRI. Yet the clash between the meme and del Moral encapsulates a broader conflict between different forms of a same expression, and yet on one hand, Memes "resuelva, atiende" represents a lighthearted and humorous approach to problem-solving, reflecting a sense of pragmatism and practicality but on the other hand, Alejandra del Moral's "unir es resolver" tries to embody a more serious and politically charged message, focusing on the power of unity and collective action.It is perhaps only a clash between these two figures that reflect the tension among manipulation, humor, seriousness, individualism, collectivism, digital culture, ignorance and political discourse. In terms of impact, the rivalry between Memes "resuelva, atiende" and Alejandra del Moral's "unir es resolver" has sparked how idiotic and voided dialogues on internet can be through a complete week.

Making art no. 6: "No one deserves as much as us." :)

It must be evident the artist does not need an agenda nor knowledges, so it is necessary to accept that the doctor's profession is and only is to repair automobiles. And if the worker has gotten all his diplomas by just learning formulas to approving exams and forget all about that later after finished school, then any product is clearly attainable for anyone by just wishing it and with a hit of heels three times. What is the use of politicians to us if they are not fascists nor murderers? A good health is not achieved with shit like fraternity nor by learning abilities to live! Isn't obvious? It is urgent to stop breathing together with all the will of our heart and allow all our bitches define accurately our laws and medical system as soon as possible and offer free stuff weekly no matter bad qualities nor even if it's not for pleasure or our duties; OPEN THE EYES! At the end we can witnessing right now how some are selling morbidity on youtube about who is lying to whom among supposed artists, bad choices on clothes to wear or not on tv or compromising shots during family schedules, and the fact of how anyone gets a salary behaving like a ridiculous smiling statue front a camera.

   

   

So here a friendly reminder: The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

   

   

   

NO ONE gonna define what will happen next if it isn't us.

   

Making Art no. 4: "Between make anything and the artistic value".

Must art have some kind of strategy? History seems to show a distance between the ways of understanding the artistic study in different countries; It causes us to accept that any final product sometimes has consequences due to minute details, or almost unreliable philological bases, however, one does not intend any textual criticism or classical ecdotic since art can only be based on its meaning and the management of its economic preparation with diachronic processes like Greco-Latin, romantic and pagan precedents. Art, then, does not aim for social brilliance or indirect symbolic rewards since it mixes the cultured with the popular as a desire for self-representation beyond any style, whose most common procedure will be the provision of work done, the evaluation, or possible external help for the leading author of the artistic system, but not for the simple creative.

 // 

So how should it be presented? How to differentiate a poetic language from prosaic language? Does it belong to some biocultural analytical puzzle? Should your subjective and / or objective perception be specified? On average, no art offers any advantage over productive means, in addition, if art did not offer benefits and only demanded time, energy and resources, its cognitive patterns would not feed the hunger for information that leads to the meaningful matrices from which we can make valuable inferences. Therefore we like bright, null and distinct colors, sharp contours, complex shapes, designs and materials on surfaces; And the more flexible minds are to handle multiple patterns on multiple levels, and the more open their mastery of the information that surrounds them, the better they can predict and act in the face of the nonsense of a complex world not built for the art itself that concentrates the profusion of symbolic perception of visual, auditory and social behavior patterns.

 // 

And since emotional intensity helps to consolidate memory, the more attention is drawn to one or another X art, and the more it elicits responses, the more it can reconfigure our minds for its advantages over its purpose, identification, adaptation, and its continuity by allowing inferred meaning both at global anthropological levels, as well as at local historical, political, economic, technological, cultural, intellectual, and artistic levels. Works created by and for the flow of economic attention framed between a space, the media and forms that constitute it, pay for it and provide feedback just as its consumer does, who makes an appropriation of their choices making then uniques from which the product gains power over the repressed recreational subversion in the specialization of a defined exercise in the mercantile characteristics generated by its consumption with evolutionary exchange patterns understood as historical preferences and economic capacities. Taking us by the hand to the context of production defined by the economic, emotional, political, religious, social and cultural circumstances in which an artist is immersed when producing a work, which will demand time, energy and resources, and where their cognitive patterns will not be able to feed the hunger for the information that leads to the meaningful matrices of the final product from which it is possible to make valuable inferences; However, the work can reaffirm itself as a communicative manifesto depending on what is implicit in it.

 // 

Thus we get to the point where the artist must create art and not a market, and where the marketer will create a market but never an art. A situation almost similar to creating a currency available for a market that requires a transnational historical trend and be significantly flexible, and that may or may not be compared with some investment in real estate or with a simple collection of sports cards so, to offer anything is enough? Should art impress and make the viewer uncomfortable? Is 'Sonata for pepáphone and voice, opus 140' a good example? Are we talkig only about hunger? Have we reached the limit of making any kind of item a product? If I intend to relate a writing with a murderous look, should I care? The only sound that the air pump produces directly to the vagina is noise added to the immediate need to create a melody for such accompaniment, which in the end becomes the same thing: Noise. Which at the same time makes one wonder if everything about composing can be summed up to believing and getting involved in an idea or, if perhaps all the studies that one should or could have carried out were once without context before the idea of ​​perhaps the artist or producer in question only produces uninteresting, unnecessary works or products or around related definitions. Are the different kind of performances known? Is the presentation of an "Opus" more valuable to human sculptures like "Rushing man" or people like Estevan Mortensen? What kind of difference is on presenting yourself with agility and creativity as Dan Menendez "The piano juggler"? Do people understand or know the different examples that exist?

   

   

   

Video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJQvHSZW3eg

Social: Banned videos from YT no. 1

   

   

If you knew that your doctor's identification number does not exist and his diploma is false, would you still allow him to perform an open heart surgery with you? Would you entrust your travels to a pilot who has made only a couple of flights and chosen to misunderstand the controls of an airplane? Would you trust your life to a lawyer who has sold your freedom? Would you inhabit a house built and designed by a criminal who has never studied architecture? Can you trust someone who talks about someone but has never talked to him? Can you trust a famous person who suddenly says that eating rotten fruits is not bad for the health and who says that studying biology is unnecessary? Can you be friends with someone who has only been rude, irresponsible, gossipy and hypocrite to anyone but accuses to the irony of life? Is it possible to trust someone who on a whim enters into a greenhouse only to step on and destroy all its flowers? Can you be friends with someone who speaks rudely and despotically to a waiter in any restaurant? Would you wear an invisible suit that a tailor sells you with the emptied and absurd "context" that only smart people can see? Can you trust a journalist who instead of doing her job spends her time telling people how to act or what to think? What kind of parents raise their children unethically? Would you leave firearms within reach of your children without any warning or explanation? Why would someone at a young age be fascinated with firearms?

   

How would you describe the mix between the stupidity and the immaturity with a gun?

   

   

Social: Is onlyfans secure?

Can it be assured that the internet has been built on the basis of anonymous speech? Although after years of learning about who tries to investigate who can be said that privacy is something difficult to achieve speaking from how data may only have market use value for capitalist systems or large companies such as Amazon, Google, Facebook or Microsoft that collect navigation data for targeted advertisements, as well as all data that might be leaked between hackers or people of bad or inexplicable intentions, since plaintiffs in defamation cases use subpoenas to try to unmask identities of internet users who have been interrogated, arrested, tortured and sentenced to long prison terms for the "crime" of speaking critically about governments and institutions. So is it bad to want to remain anonymous? Hasn't it been a cornerstone for the same democratic expression, for example the northamerican one with the publications of the 'Federalist Papers' under the pseudonym Publius, or for the dialogues that daily users carry out or even have carried out during the Arab Spring through the network and through social networks?

 \ \ 

On the case of the internet, it must be realized that no blog can be completely anonymous since with enough time, resources and political will, a group or government can discover the identity of the writer since there is always a risk when you say what you think to people that they cannot tolerate dissent on issues such as the corruption of a public servant, or bad procedures or protocols of fascist institutions but, is it necessary to provide biometric data even to register on platforms to buy pornography as http:// onlyfans.com does?

 \ \ 

So, it is not only about a possible government spying on its people, it is also that with the implementation of exaggerated registries or standards in mobile telephony, possible cases of identity theft, arbitrary or abusive interference with dignity, honor, reputation, personality development, or possible intrusions to privacy and security from the data collected against any of the distortions in the market, protocol or agreement are implied with a flow of public spending reaching extremes such as extortion or favors selling. Is it possible to take control of your information online? In the day to day it seems that the only way to remain anonymous is not to use the network, which is not an option; So from the moment one turns on a computer, one must take into perspective the use of a router as instance, to mitigate the use of hackers who may be constantly bombarding IP addresses to see if it is possible to enter their system when locating an ISP provider. At the same time, those who may be somewhat careless when browsing the web, in the same way as new exploits are found or when a device fails, posibilities that the user can walk with the VPN itself leaking (https://pcmag.com/how-to/is-your-vpn-leaking) or by keeping too much personal information such as passwords; Of which, in case of priority anonymity use, any browser intended for privacy must be kept with the Javascript disabled as Tor Browser may well be. 

\ \

 Another factor apparently is that the only anonymous mobiles are prepaid telephones (aka a burner) that although a call log is kept from them and the user might be triangulated via GPS, it is possible to register it without associating it with the user's name and discard it, which can be said is functional when not wanting to receive calls from numbers that have one blocked with an iPhone or Smartphone, when there is also a 2014 investigation by Neophapsis Labs (http://www.zdnet.com/article/recycled- burner-number-sends-sex-workers-clients-to-security-researcher) that found companies recycle numbers quickly, meaning spam calls are still possible. It is added there is no evidence or positive correlation between a registry and the reduction of criminality in extortion since recharge systems and relatively cheap chip changes are used daily, as well as the same authority can be corrupted, a subject of which there is cloth where to sew.

 \ \ 

Did courts recognized that the right to speak anonymously is part of the freedoms of speech, belief, of the press, of petition, and of assembly already? Although the use of the international network is rather a privilege and not a right, as on cases where a person is not authorized to use any computer, the right to personality, dialogue, the guarantee of autonomy and the information if they are, exist; So to say that by refusing to give your information the protocol will be to immediately cancel the lines of the clients without the right to reactivation, payment or compensation, it is talking about all that near to despotism, totalitarian control, and dictatorship by the simple fact of wanting to express, promote, pursue, communicate, or defend anonymously, or conserved as private, exempt and immune and/or in a unnoticed way by sometimes unstable governments and societies on changing. 

\ \

 Do people in general know what has happened or not about it in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, China, United Arab Emirates, Nigeria, Pakistan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia?

 \ \ \ \ 

You want to know about: 

GLOBAL 

The amnesia incognito live system. https://tails.boum.org

USA 

Legal protections for anonymous speech

 https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/legal-protections-anonymous-speech \ \ \