Social: Banned videos from YT no. 3 Audiovisual "TV advertising"

Message that seems many do not understand

 // 

 // 

antique & original link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fTldTDjWIA

 // 

 // 

Posted on 5 ago 2017

Social: Banned videos from YT no. 2

Has man born to go naked around the world? Depends on the place? Is it correct the idea of allowing nudist beaches? Is it just about the body or about a perspective? Should one look himself naked front others? What is money? What is morality? What is the correct definition for art? What is morality for? Is it necessary or not to talk about body shame? Is it a nude, pornography? Is it a beautiful and naked girl just showing a forehead of her without suggestive poses porn? What is a limit? Why would you demand about a photograph of a naked baby who, to this point from 2022, seems not offending to anyone? Is that pornography? Does people feel ashamed of themselves when watching a photo captured by their own parents being babies taking a shower? Would you allow your friends to see those images? Is it the same to observe a person with a body molded by exercise to an extremely obese person? Should one explain the difference between Scary and Spooky? Can you imagine yourself dancing naked front your parents, uncles, aunts or other family members? And from this we must say it is a party. Would you organize such thing? How should one be educated? Is the simple chest of a man or a woman the same? Should aboriginal tribes be ashamed that their women do not use bras or blouses? Showing yourself naked around metropolitan streets works to manifestate any thing? WHAT IS THE POINT?

Social: A bunch of nasty stories, about nasty people, told on a nasty way.

Of course it is outrageous that people are not well prepared and with so little concern for their country, but most of them agree with our leaders only for money, the degree of impunity for their excesses.  Citizens with apathy, conformists, indoctrinated, aligned, and left; Perhaps all accomplices under the degree of the subconscious. Yet all the advertisements we see have been etched into our memory and our decisions are apparently only based on consumer choices, but one is from the generation in which it was proclaimed daily that "There is nothing that is really necessary if you feel like that."  Let heads rolling, how beneficial is it to preserve negative patterns?  Is finding a balance without hypocrisy of abandoning oneself in any belief exclusively to win something possible? Betting on an almost Blaise Pascal style or perhaps a completely different one is utopian? (1)

One will try to explain himself, on my case it was difficult to grow up knowing that the thing that I could grab onto was dead from its roots, however, on my opinion there are no need to extreme resentments; And that is why I decided to search for social networks as an instrument of manifestation and social evolution, which I accept opened a channel of communication that on my perspective continues to be indifferent to their real needs:  Different generations identify themselves as oppressed, perhaps for the same reason their modes of protest occasionally go beyond the limits that degrade new oppressed and exalt non-existent values, on the style of preparatory popularity, giving rise to aggression on any way and on any medium or place that can be made present. It seems easy to forget that the word of everywhere these days is Tolerance;  To understand it is to achieve moral superiority by being tolerant. And it must be understood that tolerance does not mean suffering or enduring, and to fully tolerate it is necessary to want to.  The desire to know new ideas and the need to emphasize them for study and debate, possibly thus managing to resolve our differences; Simple suggestion to stay flexible.
 

But to call this "on my practice", social reconciliation as a first step to achieve true national development is close to nil.  Respect and the exercise of constructive criticism and ideological solidarity on every sense that strengthens the rule of law and national harmony, are forgotten when it comes to benefits.  "What's good for me on the end?"  Distrust predominates when becoming aware and does not consider who is legitimate, at some point pretending to act differently.  There are too many things that do not retain any grace, life itself has no meaning in its generality.  You might wonder why waste yourself?  However, the most honest thing anyone can do, I suppose, is to be totally who you are and write, speak and act like one.  Freedom of expression and belief, with all its immunity under the Magna Carta.  Water and then wind.

P.S.
If theres an objection is facing references, this text is only research and personal analysis of all of them.  No interest unrelated to the opinion, act of reply or preservation of various notes.

 

P.S.2.

Repost from  Sunday, May 12, 2013

https://mojejstronie.blogspot.com/2013/05/1-uno.html?m=1

 

R:
 (1).  Understand the bet as regards the text as an example, for what is morally accepted or what is beneficial learned or modified through ethical advancement.  Bet on their own beliefs, concepts, values ​​and / or ideas that guide acts to growth, be it personal or collective, by not applying such a bet exclusively to a deity. 

(1.2) It is accepted that Pascal does not intend to scientifically prove the existence of God and, in order not to fall into any fallacy of the false dilemma, let us qualify it as "Any deity or Zeitgeist from among the variety of options known from the theological field" for various applications or explanations about the quote  or the present text.

Social: Is onlyfans secure?

Can it be assured that the internet has been built on the basis of anonymous speech? Although after years of learning about who tries to investigate who can be said that privacy is something difficult to achieve speaking from how data may only have market use value for capitalist systems or large companies such as Amazon, Google, Facebook or Microsoft that collect navigation data for targeted advertisements, as well as all data that might be leaked between hackers or people of bad or inexplicable intentions, since plaintiffs in defamation cases use subpoenas to try to unmask identities of internet users who have been interrogated, arrested, tortured and sentenced to long prison terms for the "crime" of speaking critically about governments and institutions. So is it bad to want to remain anonymous? Hasn't it been a cornerstone for the same democratic expression, for example the northamerican one with the publications of the 'Federalist Papers' under the pseudonym Publius, or for the dialogues that daily users carry out or even have carried out during the Arab Spring through the network and through social networks?

 \ \ 

On the case of the internet, it must be realized that no blog can be completely anonymous since with enough time, resources and political will, a group or government can discover the identity of the writer since there is always a risk when you say what you think to people that they cannot tolerate dissent on issues such as the corruption of a public servant, or bad procedures or protocols of fascist institutions but, is it necessary to provide biometric data even to register on platforms to buy pornography as http:// onlyfans.com does?

 \ \ 

So, it is not only about a possible government spying on its people, it is also that with the implementation of exaggerated registries or standards in mobile telephony, possible cases of identity theft, arbitrary or abusive interference with dignity, honor, reputation, personality development, or possible intrusions to privacy and security from the data collected against any of the distortions in the market, protocol or agreement are implied with a flow of public spending reaching extremes such as extortion or favors selling. Is it possible to take control of your information online? In the day to day it seems that the only way to remain anonymous is not to use the network, which is not an option; So from the moment one turns on a computer, one must take into perspective the use of a router as instance, to mitigate the use of hackers who may be constantly bombarding IP addresses to see if it is possible to enter their system when locating an ISP provider. At the same time, those who may be somewhat careless when browsing the web, in the same way as new exploits are found or when a device fails, posibilities that the user can walk with the VPN itself leaking (https://pcmag.com/how-to/is-your-vpn-leaking) or by keeping too much personal information such as passwords; Of which, in case of priority anonymity use, any browser intended for privacy must be kept with the Javascript disabled as Tor Browser may well be. 

\ \

 Another factor apparently is that the only anonymous mobiles are prepaid telephones (aka a burner) that although a call log is kept from them and the user might be triangulated via GPS, it is possible to register it without associating it with the user's name and discard it, which can be said is functional when not wanting to receive calls from numbers that have one blocked with an iPhone or Smartphone, when there is also a 2014 investigation by Neophapsis Labs (http://www.zdnet.com/article/recycled- burner-number-sends-sex-workers-clients-to-security-researcher) that found companies recycle numbers quickly, meaning spam calls are still possible. It is added there is no evidence or positive correlation between a registry and the reduction of criminality in extortion since recharge systems and relatively cheap chip changes are used daily, as well as the same authority can be corrupted, a subject of which there is cloth where to sew.

 \ \ 

Did courts recognized that the right to speak anonymously is part of the freedoms of speech, belief, of the press, of petition, and of assembly already? Although the use of the international network is rather a privilege and not a right, as on cases where a person is not authorized to use any computer, the right to personality, dialogue, the guarantee of autonomy and the information if they are, exist; So to say that by refusing to give your information the protocol will be to immediately cancel the lines of the clients without the right to reactivation, payment or compensation, it is talking about all that near to despotism, totalitarian control, and dictatorship by the simple fact of wanting to express, promote, pursue, communicate, or defend anonymously, or conserved as private, exempt and immune and/or in a unnoticed way by sometimes unstable governments and societies on changing. 

\ \

 Do people in general know what has happened or not about it in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, China, United Arab Emirates, Nigeria, Pakistan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia?

 \ \ \ \ 

You want to know about: 

GLOBAL 

The amnesia incognito live system. https://tails.boum.org

USA 

Legal protections for anonymous speech

 https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/legal-protections-anonymous-speech \ \ \

Social: To do, or not to do?