Of course it is outrageous that people are not well prepared and with so little concern for their country, but most of them agree with our leaders only for money, the degree of impunity for their excesses. Citizens with apathy, conformists, indoctrinated, aligned, and left; Perhaps all accomplices under the degree of the subconscious. Yet all the advertisements we see have been etched into our memory and our decisions are apparently only based on consumer choices, but one is from the generation in which it was proclaimed daily that "There is nothing that is really necessary if you feel like that." Let heads rolling, how beneficial is it to preserve negative patterns? Is finding a balance without hypocrisy of abandoning oneself in any belief exclusively to win something possible? Betting on an almost Blaise Pascal style or perhaps a completely different one is utopian? (1)
One will try to explain himself, on my case it was difficult to grow up knowing that the thing that I could grab onto was dead from its roots, however, on my opinion there are no need to extreme resentments; And that is why I decided to search for social networks as an instrument of manifestation and social evolution, which I accept opened a channel of communication that on my perspective continues to be indifferent to their real needs: Different generations identify themselves as oppressed, perhaps for the same reason their modes of protest occasionally go beyond the limits that degrade new oppressed and exalt non-existent values, on the style of preparatory popularity, giving rise to aggression on any way and on any medium or place that can be made present. It seems easy to forget that the word of everywhere these days is Tolerance; To understand it is to achieve moral superiority by being tolerant. And it must be understood that tolerance does not mean suffering or enduring, and to fully tolerate it is necessary to want to. The desire to know new ideas and the need to emphasize them for study and debate, possibly thus managing to resolve our differences; Simple suggestion to stay flexible.
But to call this "on my practice", social reconciliation as a first step to achieve true national development is close to nil. Respect and the exercise of constructive criticism and ideological solidarity on every sense that strengthens the rule of law and national harmony, are forgotten when it comes to benefits. "What's good for me on the end?" Distrust predominates when becoming aware and does not consider who is legitimate, at some point pretending to act differently. There are too many things that do not retain any grace, life itself has no meaning in its generality. You might wonder why waste yourself? However, the most honest thing anyone can do, I suppose, is to be totally who you are and write, speak and act like one. Freedom of expression and belief, with all its immunity under the Magna Carta. Water and then wind.
P.S.
If theres an objection is facing references, this text is only research and personal analysis of all of them. No interest unrelated to the opinion, act of reply or preservation of various notes.
P.S.2.
Repost from Sunday, May 12, 2013
https://mojejstronie.blogspot.com/2013/05/1-uno.html?m=1
R:
(1). Understand the bet as regards the text as an example, for what is morally accepted or what is beneficial learned or modified through ethical advancement. Bet on their own beliefs, concepts, values and / or ideas that guide acts to growth, be it personal or collective, by not applying such a bet exclusively to a deity.
(1.2) It is accepted that Pascal does not intend to scientifically prove the existence of God and, in order not to fall into any fallacy of the false dilemma, let us qualify it as "Any deity or Zeitgeist from among the variety of options known from the theological field" for various applications or explanations about the quote or the present text.
No comments:
Post a Comment